| Intervention: resveratrol dietary supplement | ||||
| Res_lo effect on survival, females, test site = All | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.644 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.4796 | |
| Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
| 769 | 772 | |
|
| 906 | 882 | | |
| 990 | 968 | | |
| 1104 | 1077 | | |
| 1284 | 1261 | ||
| 143 | 237 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_hi effect on survival, females, test site = All | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.4818 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0356 | |
| Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
| 776 | 772 | |
|
| 905 | 882 | | |
| 1004 | 968 | | |
| 1112 | 1077 | | |
| 1246 | 1261 | ||
| 143 | 237 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_lo effect on survival, males, test site = All | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.9518 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.4223 | |
| Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
| 692 | 650 | |
|
| 830 | 826 | | |
| 954 | 949 | | |
| 1037 | 1060 | | |
| 1235 | 1268 | ||
| 159 | 309 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_hi effect on survival, males, test site = All | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.1577 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.2484 | |
| Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
| 685 | 650 | |
|
| 882 | 826 | | |
| 990 | 949 | | |
| 1077 | 1060 | | |
| 1294 | 1268 | ||
| 154 | 309 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_lo effect on survival, females, test site = TJL | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.9578 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.3503 | |
| Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
| 756 | 792 | |
|
| 925 | 888 | | |
| 990 | 972 | | |
| 1118 | 1077 | | |
| 1284 | 1261 | ||
| 47 | 68 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_hi effect on survival, females, test site = TJL | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.6877 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0264 | |
| Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
| 795 | 792 | |
|
| 896 | 888 | | |
| 1022 | 972 | | |
| 1168 | 1077 | | |
| 1242 | 1261 | ||
| 48 | 68 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_lo effect on survival, males, test site = TJL | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.5409 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.2901 | |
| Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
| 574 | 633 | |
|
| 749 | 800 | | |
| 934 | 916 | | |
| 1013 | 1007 | | |
| 1164 | 1197 | ||
| 58 | 96 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_hi effect on survival, males, test site = TJL | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.361 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 1.0 | |
| Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
| 615 | 633 | |
|
| 796 | 800 | | |
| 895 | 916 | | |
| 980 | 1007 | | |
| 1091 | 1197 | ||
| 54 | 96 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_lo effect on survival, females, test site = UM | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.4967 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 1.0 | |
| Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
| 692 | 788 | |
|
| 862 | 891 | | |
| 973 | 990 | | |
| 1094 | 1069 | | |
| 1166 | 1248 | ||
| 48 | 87 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_hi effect on survival, females, test site = UM | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.1637 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0851 | |
| Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
| 772 | 788 | |
|
| 946 | 891 | | |
| 1032 | 990 | | |
| 1126 | 1069 | | |
| 1246 | 1248 | ||
| 48 | 87 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_lo effect on survival, males, test site = UM | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.8515 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.5792 | |
| Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
| 757 | 701 | |
|
| 882 | 851 | | |
| 957 | 974 | | |
| 1082 | 1077 | | |
| 1206 | 1268 | ||
| 49 | 107 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_hi effect on survival, males, test site = UM | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.2869 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.2362 | |
| Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
| 702 | 701 | |
|
| 895 | 851 | | |
| 993 | 974 | | |
| 1138 | 1077 | | |
| 1294 | 1268 | ||
| 48 | 107 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_lo effect on survival, females, test site = UT | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.1385 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.7623 | |
| Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
| 832 | 748 | |
|
| 926 | 843 | | |
| 1047 | 964 | | |
| 1110 | 1105 | | |
| 1199 | 1192 | ||
| 48 | 82 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_hi effect on survival, females, test site = UT | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.5236 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.7678 | |
| Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
| 775 | 748 | |
|
| 867 | 843 | | |
| 975 | 964 | | |
| 1031 | 1105 | | |
| 1167 | 1192 | ||
| 47 | 82 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_lo effect on survival, males, test site = UT | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.4978 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 1.0 | |
| Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
| 722 | 586 | |
|
| 850 | 813 | | |
| 958 | 935 | | |
| 1026 | 1053 | | |
| 1235 | 1212 | ||
| 52 | 106 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||
| Res_hi effect on survival, males, test site = UT | ||
| Log-rank test | p = 0.0281 | |
| Wang-Allison test | p = 0.4015 | |
| Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
| 732 | 586 | |
|
| 950 | 813 | | |
| 1054 | 935 | | |
| 1093 | 1053 | | |
| 1201 | 1212 | ||
| 52 | 106 | ||
| Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot | |||